No he’s not. Using a single instance to counter a prevailing conclusion based on YEARS of observations is just plain silly and to honest we already have three on this board that believe that shit.
He commented on said OP ... this isn't a one off... and in this particular instance the reference does stand..
The reason behind that story not being in the news now is because, as you keenly pointed out, from years ago....However at the time..it was
The opening statement of the thread is misleading
Your years of observation should have shown you that although not always balanced throughout a time period there is balance to the goody feel stories and the doom and gloom stories...
Unfortunately doom and gloom sells and many are quite willing to overlook the good and dwell on the bad far more than is healthy
When the media gets its grips on a subject all you see is that.... doesn't mean it doesn't happen every other day of the month, year, decade, century ....