You see... taxing is necessary to maintain infrastructure. The desire for it to exclusively maintain infrastructure is what I consider the main difference between Rs and Ds (at least it should be). It is what I will vote to support at every opportunity. In that case... EVs would till be taxed for road use... just like cars.
Posts by MiniD
-
-
"Mantra"
So tax the people or privatization are the two speeds you have? You realize there are more ways to fund a government to address infrastructure issues that that, right?
Donations? Service fees? Isn't a gas tax really just a service fee? Other than that, there is no other way to fund a government than taxation. Oh... wait... how about bonds who's returns are funded by TAXES. That is basically the definition of taxation. Just so you don't have to look it up (because you seem confused):
1) a sum of money demanded by a government for its support or for specific facilities or services, levied upon incomes, property, sales, etc.
2) a burdensome charge, obligation, duty, or demand.
-
LOL! "What you tolerate" and "what you accept" are comments you misuse all the time, fishy. Look in a fucking mirror.
-
Wow... a few years late on Disney outrage, fishy. Going through every woke moment as if it were the end of the world is unnecessary. Some things speak for themselves or their writers. Maybe some Thelma outrage, too? Come on, fishy, there is just so much for you to throw in people's faces because that is the way to get things done, as this cartoon clearly demonstrates.
-
No, I don't imagine it was a fit. I do believe that vouchers are a much better solution or the option to pay for private schools. With interstate commerce, you don't have options. With much of the infrastructure, you don't have options. Privatization would be no better than taxation.
So... chanting a "no taxes" montra while trying to call someone on school-of choice issues is still nonsensical montra chanting.
-
Sweet. That's the kinda logic that nonsense no-solution montras are mad of. There's NO way that the problem with modern politics is the forced application of ill thought out seldom applicable montras instead of reason. Nope. Nosiree
-
Now you're just all over the place. Is taxing EVs for using the roads good or bad?
-
Besides the absurd idea that the government shouldn't tax us for anything... is there a reason why EVs shouldn't pay for road repair?
-
Display More
the secret?
a little fish bit.
"see level," haha
aaaand, no idea what you are saying.
Ok, kiddo, it looks like since you are the only one brave enough to look at the alleged curve.
I will specify.
Both men are standing on a salt flat at sea level. Distance is 6 miles.
Both are 6 feet tall and looking at each other with magnification optics.
Do the math and show us your steps.
If 8xdxd is not your cup of tea, no problemo.
Now,
If you have a different formula, or want Mick West's advice, by all means, provide such info
Now,
GO!
A much simpler question: do you a single photo taken from water level to even 6 ft above the shoreline of someone standing 6 miles away across water where their feet are visible? 3 miles? 2 miles?
-
It's OK fishy. You continue to look for blame. I don't know anyone who remotely fits that story but you keep pretending it's everyone that isn't as fucking crazy as you. You've been looking for people to blame for you for some time. I suggest you get a mirror.
-
I figured 69 would be the one who laughed. It's so contrived and desperate that it makes me pity you.
-
Scrutiny of facts is only possible in the presence of fact. That is science. It is why you are able to try to scrutinize these things. The reason nobody can scrutinize what you declare to be science is because it does not exist. That is not science. It is the opposite of science. It is stupidity.
-
Display More
lol, the meniscus force, seen here in the bottom frame.
Y'all Nasa globe boys think you're clever, regurgitating freemason fake physics.
Meniscus force, pshaw.
but centrifugal force somehow does not throw water off a spinning, spiraling ball that also zooms through the universe at .5 million mph?
Please explain why none of these photos show a flat horizon when actually scrutinized beyond the lies printed on them.
-
Display More
Aaaaaand,
the air in Chicago is spinning 1000 mph
and orbiting the sun at 66,600 mph
in a solar system moving .5 million mph.
Please explain why there are zero pictures available where the bottom of these buildings are visible from across Lake Michigan.
-
Display More
We live on an Infinite Plane, probably an accretion disk inside a universal torus.
Other accretion disks (dimensions) may exist, similar to a stack of pancakes.
Earth and other "planets" are enclosed habitats embedded in tne plane.
The "edge" is the optical illusion where all lines of convergence meet in our optics.
Also called the horizon, the borderline between ground and sky always rises to eye level.
That would be impossible on a globe, as the ground should shrink in size as one gains altitude.
Hold a basketball in front of your eyes. Now push it away from you.
Same difference.
Please explain this picture if the earth is an infinite plane.
-
I love it when a flat earther, who insists we never went to space, tries to use an image from space to prove a point <badly>. There is irony layered on irony.
<pssst>that image shows the line closer on the right than lower left</pssst>
-
He also points out that reputable news outlets sold their souls to do it and brought the "fake news" label on themselves by trolling someone who's going to publicly let them know what he thinks of it.
-
They break the whole thing down from a journalism perspective. I see no hint of party bias:
The press versus the president, part one<p>INTRODUCTION: ‘I realized early on I had two jobs’ The end of the long inquiry into whether Donald Trump was colluding with Russia came in July 2019, when…www.cjr.org -
As for "infinite plane" bullshit... that can be proven too. The map would be much bigger. At least with an edge you can plead ignorance. With "infinite" you have absolutely zero evidence or scientific rational.
-
Grav, there does not need to be a barrier. Things behave different with or without. That is why we have gas laws.
What you clearly cannot explain is how pressure goes down as a function of altitude... and what happens if you go up higher and higher... even with no barrier. Pressure drops. Eventually it drops to near zero. No barrier needed. Gravity is the reason regardless of motion through space.
