LoL.
They are imploding.
Burn. Fire.
That furries thing is really creepy to me.
lazs
If we are going to do anything about the fed student loan program, it should be limited to STEM degrees.
And to qualify, those programs should be limited to classes that are actually science and technology core classes.
Burn. Fire.
100% in agreement on this one.
If we are going to do anything about the fed student loan program, it should be limited to STEM degrees.
And to qualify, those programs should be limited to classes that are actually science and technology core classes.
If we are going to do anything about the fed student loan program, it should be limited to STEM degrees.
And to qualify, those programs should be limited to classes that are actually science and technology core classes.
And then we'd have a billion engineers running around without the slightest clue.
Pull all federal funding of colleges, of loans, and of guarantees. For everything.
Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics.
I doubt 1 billion students (out of 300 million Americans) would choose engineering over the other options.
I am just saying if we are going to have the loan program, let’s get our money’s worth and not have a bunch of “Furry critters” PhDs.
I would expect four out of five high school graduates could never accomplish the math necessary for an engineering degree
a lot of them can't even do math in their head, let alone converting to fractions/decimals. If they can't use their cell phone to do it for them, they are lost.
Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics.
I doubt 1 billion students (out of 300 million Americans) would choose engineering over the other options.
I am just saying if we are going to have the loan program, let’s get our money’s worth and not have a bunch of “Furry critters” PhDs.
One path is subsidized. The other paths do not. Which path will the student choose?
One path gets free government money. The other paths aren't funded by the government. Which path will Colleges expand?
Being an Engineer myself, I'm fully aware of what STEM stands for. Our current problem isn't government intervention in liberal arts degrees. It's government intervention IN ALL DEGREES.
So as a fellow engineer, you are probably familiar with an if-then statement.
Quoteif we are going to have the loan program, (then) let’s get our money’s worth
I took math and science courses for wastewater/water and it was pretty brutal 3 hours of classes at night almost every night.. Plus we worked 9 hour days at the plant. Pretty much get off work... take a shower and change .... do the 3 hours of school and then come home and go to bed.
good news was that all the classes were being taught by pros in the field pretty much a trade school at the JC.
lazs
So as a fellow engineer, you are probably familiar with an if-then statement.
You apparently never took an economics class.
Creating more trained engineers doesn't create more engineering jobs. Nor does it make anything else better. We'd be trading Fine Arts majors flipping burgers for Engineering majors flipping burgers.
According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, between 2016 and 2026 there has been and will be a shortfall of six million engineers, or more.Jan 31, 2023
If they would only open some more philosophy factories
According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, between 2016 and 2026 there has been and will be a shortfall of six million engineers, or more.Jan 31, 2023
A lie to open the door to import cheap labor to take American jobs.
If they would only open some more philosophy factories
And gender study factories
A lie to open the door to import cheap labor to take American jobs.
From the first engineering job search site I came across:
QuoteSearch 130,809 Jobs Hand-Picked for Engineering Pros
Don’t have an account yet? Register yourself now and be a part of our community!
