Why do cuntservatives hate freedom?

  • https://www.nytimes.com/2018/0…artment-prosecutions.html



    Trump Administration Takes Step That Could Threaten Marijuana Legalization Movement


    Image

    merlin_113423509_197b9445-cbbb-454c-9374-994588102d26-articleLarge.jpg?quality=30&auto=webp

    The Trump administration will free federal prosecutors to more aggressively prosecute marijuana laws.CreditJim Wilson/The New York Times


    By Charlie Savage and Jack Healy

    Jan. 4, 2018

    WASHINGTON — The Trump administration freed federal prosecutors on Thursday to more aggressively enforce marijuana laws, effectively threatening to undermine the legalization movement that has spread to six states, most recently California.

    In a move that raised doubts about the viability and growth of the burgeoning commercial marijuana industry, Attorney General Jeff Sessions rescinded an Obama-era policy that had discouraged federal prosecutors from bringing charges of marijuana-related crimes in states that have legalized sales of the drug.

    In a statement, Mr. Sessions said the Obama-era guidance undermined “the rule of law” and the Justice Department’s mission to enforce federal statutes.

    “Today’s memo on federal marijuana enforcement simply directs all U.S. attorneys to use previously established prosecutorial principles that provide them all the necessary tools to disrupt criminal organizations, tackle the growing drug crisis, and thwart violent crime across our country,” he said.

    In a briefing with reporters, Justice Department officials refused to say whether they intended for federal prosecutors to carry out a federal crackdown on marijuana dispensaries, or whether the Trump administration was merely creating ambiguity to chill growth of the semi-legal commercial marijuana industry.

    But the move seemed certain to increase the confusion surrounding whether it is legal to sell, buy or possess marijuana in the United States. Federal law has long prohibited those activities, and in 2013, after voters in Colorado and Washington State voted to decriminalize marijuana for recreational use, the Justice Department deliberated about how to handle the resulting disconnect between state and federal law.

    You have 4 free articles remaining.

    Subscribe to The Times


    Ultimately, the Obama administration decided not to sue such states, and the Justice Department issued a policy memo instructing federal prosecutors to de-prioritize marijuana-related prosecutions in those states — except in certain cases, such as when there were sales to children, gang-related activity, or diversions of the product to states where it remained entirely illegal.

    That guidance was known as the “Cole memo” after the then-deputy attorney general who issued it, James Cole.

    The federal government’s hands-off approach allowed a new industry to flourish in states that had decided to legalize and regulate marijuana use and sales for recreational and medical use. In Colorado, one of the first states to broadly legalize the drug for adult use, marijuana sales now top $1 billion each year and thousands of people work in the industry, in jobs ranging from “bud trimmers” to marijuana tour guides for out-of-state visitors.

    Huge grow warehouses sprouted up inside old industrial neighborhoods, and companies that produce marijuana-laced candies, infusions and drinks have large-scale production facilities — all of which may now have a bull’s-eye on their backs.

    “I do expect to see the larger investors and businesses targeted,” said Kevin Sabet, a prominent critic of legalized marijuana and former drug-control policy official in the Obama administration, who praised the step. “I’m not sure whether local mom-and-pop marijuana shops will be affected.”

    California began allowing the sale of recreational marijuana on Monday, joining Colorado, Washington, Oregon, Alaska and Nevada. Massachusetts and possibly Maine are expected to begin sales this year.

    Mr. Sessions was a vocal opponent of marijuana legalization as a United States senator from Alabama. At his confirmation hearing in January, he said he saw some value in how the Obama administration evaluated whether to spend resources on prosecuting marijuana cases in states that had legalized the drug.

    “I won’t commit to never enforcing federal law,” he said, “but absolutely it’s a problem of resources for the federal government.”

    Still, he suggested, there was legitimate criticism that prosecutors may have shied away from potential cases that they should have brought under the exceptions listed in the Cole memo.

    The Justice Department’s move is likely to have the biggest effect on major funding sources for marijuana retailers and large-scale growing and production operations, said Mr. Sabet, who is president of an advocacy group called Smart Approaches to Marijuana.

    “It puts the industry on notice in these states who thought they had cover from the states and the feds,” he said. “All these people are going to wake up today with a bit of a heartache because they thought were scot-free, when in reality, they’re not.”

    Several lawmakers representing states that have legalized marijuana reacted angrily to the news. Among them, Senator Cory Gardner, Republican of Colorado, accused Mr. Sessions of violating promises had made and threatened retaliation.

    “This reported action directly contradicts what Attorney General Sessions told me prior to his confirmation. With no prior notice to Congress, the Justice Department has trampled on the will of the voters in CO and other states,” Mr. Gardner wrote on Twitter, adding: “I am prepared to take all steps necessary, including holding DOJ nominees, until the Attorney General lives up to the commitment he made to me prior to his confirmation.”

    Another lawmaker, Representative Earl Blumenauer, an Oregon Democrat who is co-chairman of the Congressional Cannabis Caucus, called for people to mobilize and push back against the Justice Department decision.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    “This is outrageous,” Mr. Blumenauer said. “Going against the majority of Americans — including a majority of Republican voters — who want the federal government to stay out of the way is perhaps one of the stupidest decisions the attorney general has made.”

    But in a conference call with reporters organized by Mr. Sabet’s anti-marijuana legalization group, Patrick Kennedy, a former Democratic congressman from Rhode Island who advises the group, praised the move as a blow for public health. Marijuana users should receive treatment, not go to jail, Mr. Kennedy said, but he said the country should not allow a new profit-driven commercial push for drug consumption akin to the liquor and tobacco industries.

    The move is particularly poignant in California, where the state’s marijuana industry, by far the largest in the country, is still celebrating the launch on Monday of recreational marijuana sales. More than 100 dispensaries began selling marijuana across the state, and many more are expected to open in the coming weeks once San Francisco and Los Angeles begin issuing licenses.

    Henry G. Wykowski, a leading cannabis attorney in San Francisco, said he has been inundated with questions from his clients on what they should do to defend themselves.

    “I can say unequivocally that we as an industry will aggressively defend our rights to engage in an activity that is authorized by state laws,” he said. “They have challenged us before,” he said of federal authorities, “and we stood up for our rights and we ultimately prevailed.”

    California was the first state to legalize medical marijuana more than two decades ago, and the industry is now entrenched. The state produces far more marijuana than it consumes; the surplus is sold illegally across state lines. Those interstate sales have been the prime target of law enforcement officials but have proved difficult to control.

    Nationwide, the marijuana market in states that authorize medical or recreational marijuana is estimated at around $6 billion and projected to grow to $9 billion by the end of the year, according to Marijuana Business Daily, a trade publication that conducts research. Chris Walsh, the editorial director of the publication, estimates there are about 4,500 medical and recreational shops across the country. That number is projected to grow significantly this year as the rollout of licenses proceeds in California.

    “They are not going to put this industry back in the bottle,” Mr. Walsh said.

    Mr. Blumenauer accused Mr. Sessions of breaking a campaign promise by President Trump not to interfere with state marijuana laws. And Mr. Gardner retweeted a video of Mr. Trump telling a Colorado journalist in a July 2016 interview that if he were elected, he would not use federal authority to shut down sales of recreational marijuana in states that had legalized it.

    “I think it’s up to the states,” Mr. Trump said then. “I am a states person. I think it should be up to the states. Absolutely.”

    Charlie Savage reported from Washington, and Jack Healy from Denver. Katie Benner contributed reporting from Washington and Thomas Fuller from San Francisco.

    On Twitter, follow Charlie Savage @charlie_savage and Jack Healy @jackhealyNYT.

    • 953


    Related Coverage


    U.S. Won’t Sue to Reverse States’ Legalization of Marijuana



    States Keep Saying Yes to Marijuana Use. Now Comes the Federal No.



  • Fuckabunchofpotheads....

    MNN on 6/18/19

    "chump will assuredly lose 2020 barring an event that cancels the election - he just cant keep his scummy yankee mouth shut"


    MNN on 6/24/19

    Chump is going to tote an ass kicking nov 2020


    MNN on 11/14/19

    fact is it is within a year of the election, the Senate will not allow him to appoint her successor. Nov 2020 he will lose.

  • Well Red, you know the old saying, Drunks run Stop Signs, Potheads wait for them to turn green.

    Rock-Ribbed Capitalist

    No amount of evidence will ever persuade an idiot - Mark Twain

    TWAT on 10/14/2019 :

    Lemme say that again... I don't care. If. The accusations against Trump. Are factual. Or not.




  • Backyard Commandos INC, HMFIC


    I disagree but I respect your right to be stupid.


    Winners focus on winning, losers focus on winners.


    It's hard for liberals with mental disorders to think that other people don't also have the same mental disorders. - Danneskjold 2018

  • Democrats had eight years to legalize pot at the Federal level. Several of those years were an unstoppable supermajority.


    If they decide to jump onto the fad du jour on this one....it will be so transparent that they will lose even more voters.

  • Democrats had eight years to legalize pot at the Federal level. Several of those years were an unstoppable supermajority.

    Yeah, but I'm sure with President Obama's firm anti-cannabis stance, he would have vetoed it immediately.

  • There actually does need to be a national/federal level discussion on this. It is really nothing tho compared to sanctuary cities. There are so many fucking laws and the line between states rights and the feds is so fucking blurred that it is time to shit or get off the pot.


    meanwhile the Trumpster has made it so that for every new regulation we get 22 old ones are trashed... I call that a good start.


    lazs

    "Don't let it end like this. Tell them I said something."



    Pancho Villa, last words (1877 - 1923)

  • Someone once said...


    "The best way to get rid of bad laws is by strictly enforcing them."


    This penchant the .gov has of ignoring inconvenient laws is bad for business.

    Of all tyrannies a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies, The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of their own conscience. — C.S. Lewis

    :this

  • You know, goat that if you really. Gave a shit about these freedoms you'd turn your back on your black prince and his chosen witch successor and look towards the Libertarians.

    They've been pro do whatever the fuck you want since forever.

    Absinthe makes the tart grow fonder.


    Celebrating those happy times when the penis is an internal organ.

  • The president doesn't make laws. The legislative branch does. Enough of bypassing congress with wimpy executive order. If congress wants to legalize it, let them. Till then, I find it hard to fault a president for choosing to follow the law.

  • Yeah? Because they're pussies?? That's what you really think?

    Of all tyrannies a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies, The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of their own conscience. — C.S. Lewis

    :this

  • It is.


    What do *you* think their reason is?

    I don't know about sluggish, but I think it's because they're beholden to the same corporate interests rebublicans are, and have too much payola tied up in the whole war on drugs, particularly on an international front, to go willingly down the path of... 'Yeah maybe we fucked this one up... '

    Absinthe makes the tart grow fonder.


    Celebrating those happy times when the penis is an internal organ.

  • Newly created posts will remain inaccessible for others until approved by a moderator.

    The last reply was more than 365 days ago, this thread is most likely obsolete. It is recommended to create a new thread instead.