Fucking bitch won't leave me alone today. She knows something is up, probably because it shows that I am merely tolerating her presence.
careful! some lawyers have advised women to even fake an attack n shit... or call 911 n say their scared... depends on the state...
0 tolerance stats just them callin will put you in jail... be polite!!!! RECORD everything!
United Nations launches 'war on free speech'
Expert warns organizations wants to 'shut down' those who disagree with its agenda
The United Nations’ crackdown on “hate speech” defines the term so broadly that just about anything could be considered in violation, according to a political analyst.
That’s at least partly because of agitation from Muslim-majority countries demanding that anyone who criticizes Islam be punished, writes Judith Bergman, a columnist lawyer and senior fellow at the Gatestone Institute.
“The U.N.’s all-out war on free speech is on,” she said.
“Forget everything about the free exchange of ideas: the U.N. feels that its ‘values’ are being threatened and those who criticize those values must therefore be shut down,” she explained.
Bergman said the newest attack on speech got started when U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres told the special adviser for the prevention of genocide, Adama Dieng, to draw up a plan.
Guterres said, “We need to enlist every segment of society in the battle for values that our world faces today – and, in particular, to tackle the rise of hate speech, xenophobia and intolerance. We hear troubling, hateful echoes of eras long past.”
Then he likened segments of today’s political debates to the 1930s.
He said: “Words are not enough. We need to be effective in both asserting our universal values and in addressing the root causes of fear, mistrust, anxiety and anger. That is the key to bring people along in defense of those values that are under such grave threat today.”
Now that plan is ready, Bergman wrote, with Guterres’ confirmation of the United Nations Strategy and Plan of Action on Hate Speech.
Stating that “hate” is going mainstream, it promises to “confront hate speech at every turn” without limiting “freedom of speech.”
“Except the U.N. most definitely seeks to limit freedom of speech, especially the kind that challenges the U.N.’s agendas,” Bergman wrote. “This was evident with regard to the Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration in which it was explicitly stated that public funding to ‘media outlets that systematically promote intolerance, xenophobia, racism and other forms of discrimination towards migrants’ should be stopped.”
Bergman wrote that whatever “constitutes intolerance, xenophobia, racism or discrimination was naturally left undefined, making the provision a convenient catchall for governments who wish to defund media that dissent from current political orthodoxy on migration.”
The U.N. says any communication containing discriminatory language based on “religion, ethnicity, nationality, race, color, descent, gender or other identity factor” is hate speech.
It demands all governments, societies, and the private sector attack such speech with which it disagrees.
“Disturbingly, the U.N. plans to put pressure directly on media and influence children through education,” she explained, citing the U.N.’s own call for “partnerships” with media to “promote” nondiscrimination.
“The new action plan plays straight into the decades-long attempts of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) to ban criticism of Islam,” Bergman noted. “In the wake of the launch of Guterres’ action plan, Pakistan has already presented a six-point plan ‘to address the new manifestations of racism and faith-based hatred, especially Islamophobia’ at the United Nations headquarters.”
Bergman said Pakistan’s ambassador already has proposed international efforts to “counter Islamophobia, which is today the most prevalent expression of racism and hatred.”
The effort already has earned the support of Facebook, the report said, which promised “to remove fake accounts” that upset “the entire Muslim Ummah (community).”
And Pakistan has demanded that national legislation be used by governments, civil society and social media to stop such speech.
WND has reported efforts by the Organization of Islamic Cooperation to have installed in international law a ban on any criticism of Islam.
Under Islamic law, it is a serious offense to criticize Allah, Muhammad or Islam. In countries such as Pakistan, a Muslim can take a non-Muslim to court and claim he was “offended” by something
that was said, resulting in a trial and jail time, even death, for the non-Muslim.
Christians in Pakistan, Indonesia, Egypt, Sudan and other Muslim-dominated countries have been the targets of brutal persecution, with the blasphemy laws often serving as the catalyst for their incarceration. Christians have been jailed, stoned, beheaded and had acid thrown in their faces for violating the blasphemy laws.
The OIC consists of 57 Muslim-majority countries and boasts the largest voting bloc at the United Nations. Its goal has been to make members’ bans on criticism of Islam the standard worldwide.
As far back as 2011, with the help of then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, the U.N. Human Rights Council was pursuing plans to combat “intolerance, negative stereotyping and stigmatization of, and discrimination, incitement to violence, and violence against persons based on religion or belief.”
A short time later, the OIC launched the Istanbul Process with the help of Clinton to begin establishing the standards in laws.
there are times in life when the best thing to do with..
blame, anger, outrage, etc...
is to put it all in the corner... on a time out... with it's nose against the wall...
and angry person is like a city with no walls... you have no defense...
we were all given a promise!
the promise is... if we give it all over to the BOSS...
and do our best to let it all go...
the BOSS will exact any revenge we are owed...!!!
and we will probably over time feel sorry for the person we were so angry with...
point being... don't act out of anger or revenge...
just demand what is yours... nothing more... nothing less...
just my opinion so....
and if ya have to... get a lawyer... n pay em out of your half... otherwise you could lose your half... and then some...
If I read the story correctly... refusing to wear something religious... is now a no no... you will be punished for doing so.... unless it's Christian?
Hmmm... doesn't that state have a large population of folks that require women wear them things?
could this be considered... pandering?
kinda a confusing issue here... is it a religion verses Bill of Rights verse personal choice verses ???
U.S. pageant winner refuses hijab, gets dethroned
Officials of the Miss World America pageant removed Miss Michigan’s title because she refused to allow a Muslim woman to “forcibly” put a hijab on her head and then reported the incident on social media.
“I suggest you all fully review what you stand for and what you condemn,” wrote Miss Michigan Kathy Zhu to pageant officials after they ordered her title removed.
The IBTimes reported Zhu, a 20-year-old model who supports President Trump, was informed she had been stripped of the Miss Michigan title.
Pageant officials accused her of “offensive, insensitive and inappropriate content” and told her “effectively immediately, MWA does not recognize you as a participant of any sort or in any capacity as it relates to any and all events of MWA.”
The condemnation was signed by Laurie DeJack, state director of MWA Michigan.
Media reports cited Zhu’s “controversies” such as her mention of the fact that a majority of violent black deaths are caused by other blacks.
Zhu addressed the pageant’s reference to her being “insensitive.”
“Do you know what is ‘insensitive’? What’s ‘insensitive’ is that women in the middle east are getting STONED TO DEATH for refusing to obey their husband’s orders to wear hijabs. A muslim woman tried to FORCIBLY put a hijab on my head without my permission. I tweeted about it on my social media, and it got the attention of the media. Almost everyone was supportive of me refusing to be put in that situation.”
She added: “Are the people in MWA implying that they advocate for the punishment of women who refuse to wear a hijab? … If this was a catholic rosary that someone forced me to try on and I refused, people would not have even bat an eye.”
more on site...