Posts by ThotuWasAToad

    Tinyhands lies about shit that's on video. Shit he's put in writing. Shit he said a minute or two prior. That's just who he is and how his administration operates. The fact that his lies will quickly be made obvious has never been an obstacle.

    Tinyhands counts on the fact that his supporters are idiots... and don't care that he's lying even when they do notice. I gotta say... it's an effective approach if you have tens of millions of low-information ideologues backing you.

    Barr is lying. It'll come out in time... and y'all will long since have moved on to the next manufacturwd outrage.

    Tinyhands has been exposed as a liar *thousands* of times. Hasn't stopped him or even slowed him down.

    We all know Barr is lying. Only question is how long it'll take to uncover that, and what can be done about it.

    ..... an investigation of a crime that never existed. WHAT would be the motive to obstruct such an investigation?

    It's not the crime; it's the cover-up.

    Ken Starr found jack shit in the *whitewater* investigation to charge Billybob with. So Republicunts went after him for a shitty little process crime.

    Rest assured that so long as a demented retard occupies the white house,





    Exoneration my ass. This is nothing but a delay tactic.




    FacebookTwitterEmailCommentPrintContinue to article content

    Attorney General William Barr provided a summary of the Mueller report's findings “with the understanding that the report itself would be released after the redaction process," a Justice Department spokeswoman said. | Jim Watson/AFP/Getty Images


    Dems ratchet up demands in Mueller probe after questions raised over Barr summary

    The requests came after the DOJ defended the release of an initial summary of special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation.


    04/04/2019 09:35 AM EDT

    Updated 04/04/2019 03:55 PM EDT

    Share on Facebook Share on Twitter

    A top House Democrat on Thursday demanded that the Justice Department produce all communications between Attorney General Bill Barr and special counsel Robert Mueller, citing news reports indicating that some members of Mueller's team are bristling at Barr's characterization of their final report on Russian collusion.

    Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler is also demanding the immediate release of any summaries that Mueller's team intended to become public.

    "You have already provided an interpretation of the Special Counsel’s conclusions in a fashion that appears to minimize the implications of the report as to the President," Nadler said in a letter to Barr on Thursday. "Releasing the summaries — without delay — would begin to allow the American people to judge the facts for themselves."

    Nadler's missive follows an outcry from Democratic lawmakers over the reports — first appearing in The New York Times and the Washington Post — suggesting members of Mueller's team informed associates that they felt Barr downplayed the damaging evidence of obstruction against Trump and withheld information about Russia's election interference that they believed he would have made public by now.

    Instead, Barr issued his own four-page summary of Mueller's conclusions two weeks ago, quoting selectively from Mueller's report in a way Democrats have suggested could be misleading. President Donald Trump has highlighted Mueller's letter to declare "total exoneration" by Mueller's investigators.

    POLITICO Playbook newsletter

    Sign up today to receive the #1-rated newsletter in politics

    EmailSign Up

    By signing up you agree to receive email newsletters or alerts from POLITICO. You can unsubscribe at any time.

    The Department of Justice on Thursday defended Barr's summary, saying he couldn’t disclose the full report because it contained protected grand jury information. The statement came after some members of Mueller's team were reportedly unhappy with Attorney General William Barr's characterization of their investigatory work.

    A Justice Department spokeswoman said Barr provided the initial findings “with the understanding that the report itself would be released after the redaction process” and “does not believe the report should be released in serial or piecemeal fashion.”

    One former Barr colleague took issue with the notion that Mueller prosecutors were speaking openly in any way about the Russia investigation. “If those reports are accurate, my view is that it’s reprehensible for line prosecutors to either directly or indirectly be making those kinds of comments,” said George Terwilliger III, who served under Barr as deputy attorney general in the George W. Bush administration.

    Democrats on Capitol Hill, however, said the new reports underscored their decision to ratchet up their demands for a public release of the Russia probe’s full findings. They expressed frustration at the news that some members Mueller's team are privately displeased with Barr's summary.

    Trump allies, meanwhile, leaped in to slam the Mueller team. Rudy Giuliani went on the offensive, taking another swipe at Mueller’s team in an apparent attempt to discredit it, while Trump himself complained Thursday morning about “the highest level of Presidential Harassment in the history of our Country!”

    Reports in The New York Times and The Washington Post late Wednesday indicated that Mueller's team members told associates that their report contained "acute" evidence that Trump obstructed the investigation of Russian links to his 2016 campaign. Both reports said Mueller's team had prepared summaries meant to be made public, but none of them has emerged. Rather, Barr issued his own four-page analysis that the president has described as "total exoneration."

    The news has already put Democrats into a furor over not seeing even a redacted version of Mueller's report.


    Trump hit with ‘accidental’ 1-day investigative assault


    "Just show us the Mueller report, that’s all," Speaker Nancy Pelosi said Thursday.

    Nadler (D-N.Y.) said his panel will issue a subpoena “in very short order” to get Mueller’s full report.

    “These latest developments ... just show additionally why it is imperative that the entire report and underlying documents be released immediately,” he said, adding it will “very likely to be necessary” to call Mueller to testify.

    Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, said it's concerning that Barr "felt it important to substitute his judgment and words for the words of the team that spent two years investigating.” Schiff later said Barr should have recused himself from the investigation because of his well-known narrow view of obstruction of justice.

    The news dropped while the White House was under siege from Capitol Hill. Democrats on Wednesday authorized a subpoena for the Mueller report, formally requested Trump's taxes and prepared to issue a subpoena for Trump financial records from an accounting firm. Multiple committees are also investigating a breach at Trump's Mar-a-Lago club by a Chinese national, and reports also indicated the House Intelligence Committee is reviewing records from Trump's inaugural committee.

    Though Trump initially expressed confidence that Mueller's report exonerated him, he has begun to betray concerns in recent days, suggesting repeatedly that he doesn't like the notion of House Democrats getting access to the full report and highlighting news clips that emphasize Barr has no obligation to reveal the report to Congress or the public. Trump continued that line of attack Thursday morning.

    "There is nothing we can ever give to the Democrats that will make them happy," he tweeted. "This is the highest level of Presidential Harassment in the history of our Country!"


    House Dems authorize subpoena for full Mueller report


    He also attacked The New York Times over its reporting, writing on Twitter that the publication “had no legitimate sources, which would be totally illegal, concerning the Mueller Report. In fact, they probably had no sources at all! They are a Fake News paper who have already been forced to apologize for their incorrect and very bad reporting on me!”

    The White House also weighed in on the reports, with press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders calling Democrats "sore losers."

    Giuliani, who was previously ecstatic about Barr's interpretation of Mueller's findings, bashed Mueller's team late Wednesday.

    "The NYT story about unspecified troubling findings in report is as accurate as the NYT saying Mueller’s staff didn’t leak," Giuliani tweeted. "Who leaked this...Mueller’s unethical staff. This proves they are Angry Democrats who couldn’t find or create evidence to support collusion or obstruction."

    Mueller's report, according to Barr's four-page summary "did not establish" a conspiracy between Trump's campaign and the Russian government. And Mueller declined to make a "traditional prosecutorial judgment" on whether Trump obstructed the probe, but Barr absolved the president unilaterally, infuriating Democrats in Congress who said Barr — a Trump appointee who had publicly taken an extremely narrow view of presidential obstruction — should not have inserted himself into Mueller's work before making it public.

    Trump has latched on to Barr's letter to claim "total exoneration" and his allies have mounted a nonstop assault on Democrats who once promoted the notion that Trump's campaign may have conspired with Russians during the 2016 presidential campaign. Yet virtually none of Mueller's evidence or findings has been revealed nor has any analysis of why he reached his decisions about conspiracy and obstruction.

    Schiff said the reports that Mueller's team crafted summaries meant to be made public undercut Barr's decision to deliver his own analysis of the report.

    "Those summaries may be among the most carefully drafted worded parts of the entire report by the Mueller team," Schiff said. "They know that most Americans aren't going to read all 400 pages. They are going to look to those top lines, and so they were probably wordsmithed very carefully, which means any deviation by Barr to give perhaps an overly optimistic picture of the president's behavior particularly as to obstruction would have concerned the members of that team."

    Rep. Mike Quigley (D-Ill.) said there’s increased urgency to be concerned Mueller’s report may be destroyed, adding, “The best indicator of future activity is past activity.” He said Barr’s “biased” summary was such an indicator.

    Darren Samuelsohn, Caitlin Oprysko, Heather Caygle and Katie Galioto contributed to this story.

    Share on Facebook Share on Twitter

    This article tagged under:Rudy Giuliani Mike Quigley Donald Trump Donald Trump 2020 Robert Mueller Adam Schiff Mueller InvestigationWilliam Barr The Mueller Report

    Missing out on the latest scoops? Sign up for POLITICO Playbook and get the latest news, every morning — in your inbox.



    Trump hit with ‘accidental’ 1-day investigative assault

    Dems ratchet up demands in Mueller probe after questions raised over Barr summary

    Grassley schools Trump on ‘idiotic’ wind turbines and cancer comment

    Cheri Bustos takes on the new left

    The world’s left-wingers are feeling the Bern

    Buttigieg draws huge crowd at Northeastern U.

    Joe Biden Created the Culture He Is a Target Of

    Prepare yourself — the Mueller redaction wars are coming

    Bennet reveals he has cancer but still wants to run for president

    China providing services to woman arrested at Mar-a-Lago


    The Barr-Shaped Cloud Over the Justice Department


    U.S. Has Done Much to Help Ukraine, But It Can Do More


    The Congressman Who Turned the VA into a Lobbying Free-For-All


    Biden’s Problem Is His Ego


    var google_casm=[];

    window.dicnf = {};(function(){window.viewReq=[];{var a=new Image;a.src=b.replace("&","&");viewReq.push(a)};}).call(this);vu("\u003dCmp0XuGWmXLX8BZPcBuLnmZANzvq891XOz73Y6gLAjbcBEAEgAGDJhoCA-KOcFYIBF2NhLXB1Yi04Mjc5Njk4NjQ3NTE1MTU4yAEJ4AIAqAMBqgT-AU_QJ0HzUz5nNrlptQCiLBheE0uOH7GsrVtp8fxqXRyQHpmAlFkT1ylEPFevukvPknEGdOaGLDmT8MGkdHza3DfD2WqHJuvn2oyHTgzkVSAUOBEJhkzrBe-2r4AjfKkg1u96udX_GnBr3IoDmJH25NAnUGQr8vpPQEKehp8CNYt3deS9tcnF4K3sPAMi48-oEE2Q6TDxAO-g0CkHNgzAVhhTcuETm5u6VxyIRB6uHdhqML_6QuFLItupw5O7Koa4Igt9O8bWXDzKtQ-Z0luaaAWQzSEmtLLSp8c3r2xID5C7XMzUlf0bGeliSdc4tAkNiYc0FgtITMmrOFWD7zXs4AQBgAax2vnQvt3D-2KgBiGIBwGQBwKoB6a-G6gH2csbqAfPzBvYBwDSCAIQAg\u0026sigh\u003d3HKKpYnvl30\u0026cid\u003dCAMSeQClSFh3rgUbT-osZNLGNrO_BwPrwX4RkzESdGwFYhd2bwhP-c-ByZN8dfwRA_37r6jbc5TkITr3fhD-bmd3vCZA013UU4U1OFK0MKUSxGjRDA2Ps1002CsbJjdperZajuRdm_UPTXHjJD6K3BmeFqDZNKHUnrFCPys\u0026tpd\u003dAGWhJmu8dAYlEFz94KFbKVUYq3CQyZHU_5OUsKZ7o-zxXxLoIlzYXnKC8nKGRGOn2oMJkCkRO03wiQwB7p75Ugd4OKLq8X1IqeyFqU84ieuHyHIfvLucuPWJid04ic492PTXn_CJsNTmVS2ZAs6vdi244QbV-qIJ2p8R5augzRqXlgA8rGG1kSpa1b8uD2il0RgidCG1dfDd5IoSrsnFoaO8gmQGEzJ1Fv0nVxcGNyxUia82jx8Ql1cBbX5GDRX2EpCVLqtQGJeNY2Jo6RNNH_o5X3hEftwh-sIg2RDiLqk6AQejeGwRPkp1kG8Sh0TpU5l_d1BJaZ8-dtvke3P5MKO-oQFSPnCyqbk52Fl8vvC7am0FPJIqsTf0ukxLlvErs3AtEcz7ZYbliYs3Iiz1_98Mj_TWpy62tez7l_r-JLCI-QU1VboMZsylWEROhIKHSY9J6rTQnWHEixRymlUkDpeZJ7nPmOnk-y3GLvc7HZUm3RpnSV-UTPlC7TdcWpXlysWlGkgxdlpiv9lVrkyqw4ZAlZmX8AfhhIY6TbCK7ac3PYjSl0vsq9jLXCrw3iHsT0v61KAgBeVYGErn_2Vcj4BmoeZrz-u1Tdev66Xu9M78tRdEAg9HhKKIxRXnFlwsht8IN2LTGgqY2rkwDxhTIw_Gl9ch4p211bOZnK48WXpg0IC5U5_FB25SlXRvcbEiqvuBmXpjzqeqcjEJsAzfVmqLxK3CSVGfSpt-JQvmIAijvUmK5XpxgGY9_Zko90xXwan4") rubicon_cb = Math.random(); rubicon_rurl = document.referrer; if(top.location==document.location){rubicon_rurl = document.location;} rubicon_rurl = escape(rubicon_rurl); window.rubicon_ad = "3236009" + "." + "js"; window.rubicon_creative = "3266745" + "." + "js";

    The poor don't seem to be paying their fair share. The rich seem to be getting screwed. I know a few 'poor' people who got back more than they paid in. That doesn't seem fair to me.


    So the people who literally own most of the economy, buy whatever laws and regulations they want, and profit immensely from said arrangement... are getting screwed in your estimation.

    Deep down, you dipshits are 19th century Royalists.

    Yeah, I know ya'll have infinite wells of sympathy for the 1%.

    Serious question here: Do you folks really see no danger in a tiny sliver of the population having near total control/ownership of both your government and your economy?

    ThotuWasAToad Regardless of who started it, Obama didn’t get the GDP above 1.5 in 8 years. It didn’t slowly go higher it was stagnant. More people went on Welfare, it got worse. He did nothing.

    When Trump got ahold of everything the GDP improved and went beyond what the pundits said was possible. And its still improving.

    So sorry the scary black man didn't clean up Rich Kid Dubya's mess fast enough for your liking. :dunno

    Funny thing is, you’d hate living under the thumbs of the people you want. How did 8 years of President Obama make you feel? Did you prosper? Remember he said we should get used to the economic malaise because it was the new reality.. How terrible!

    At the very least, President Trump is putting people back to work and off food stamps. That’s good for families. I don’t want to go back to the Obama reality. :flowers

    You mean the reality where the economy crashed under Dubya and then steadily recovered under Obama?

    Or are you like the rest of these dipshits who don't understand that cause necessarily precedes effect?