New York Attorney General Sues Trump Foundation After 2-Year Investigation


    New York Attorney General Sues Trump Foundation After 2-Year Investigation



    Donald J. Trump at a 2016 campaign event in Iowa where he raised roughly $2.8 million for his foundation.CreditDamon Winter/The New York Times

    By Danny Hakim

    • June 14, 2018

      • 1718

    The New York State attorney general’s office filed a scathingly worded lawsuit on Thursday taking aim at the Donald J. Trump Foundation, accusing the charity and the Trump family of sweeping violations of campaign finance laws, self-dealing and illegal coordination with the presidential campaign.

    The lawsuit, which seeks to dissolve the foundation and bar President Trump and three of his children from serving on nonprofit organizations, was an extraordinary rebuke of a sitting president. The attorney general also sent referral letters to the Internal Revenue Service and the Federal Election Commission for possible further action, adding to Mr. Trump’s extensive legal challenges.

    The lawsuit, filed in State Supreme Court in Manhattan, culminated a nearly two-year investigation of Mr. Trump’s charity, which became a subject of scrutiny during and after the 2016 presidential campaign. While such foundations are supposed to be devoted to charitable activities, the petition asserts that Mr. Trump’s was often improperly used to settle legal claims against his various businesses, even spending $10,000 on a portrait of Mr. Trump that was hung at one of his golf clubs.

    The foundation was also used to curry political favor, the lawsuit asserts. During the 2016 race, the foundation became a virtual arm of Mr. Trump’s campaign, email traffic showed, with his campaign manager, Corey Lewandowski, directing its expenditures, even though such foundations are explicitly prohibited from political activities.

    The attorney general’s office is seeking the Trump Foundation to pay $2.8 million in restitution, the amount raised for the foundation at a 2016 Iowa political fund-raiser. At the time, Mr. Trump skipped a Republican debate and set up his own event to raise money for veterans, though he used the event to skewer his opponents and celebrate his own accomplishments.

    Mr. Trump immediately attacked the lawsuit, characterizing it in a Twitter post as an attempt by the “sleazy New York Democrats” to damage him by suing the foundation, and vowing not to settle the case — much as he did when the same office filed a lawsuit accusing Trump University. (Mr. Trump in 2016 paid a $25 million settlement to resolve the inquiry.)

    kUuht00m_bigger.jpgDonald J. Trump ✔@realDonaldTrump The sleazy New York Democrats, and their now disgraced (and run out of town) A.G. Eric Schneiderman, are doing everything they can to sue me on a foundation that took in $18,800,000 and gave out to charity more money than it took in, $19,200,000. I won’t settle this case!...
    11:09 AM - Jun 14, 2018

    Twitter Ads info and privacy

    kUuht00m_bigger.jpgDonald J. Trump ✔@realDonaldTrump ....Schneiderman, who ran the Clinton campaign in New York, never had the guts to bring this ridiculous case, which lingered in their office for almost 2 years. Now he resigned his office in disgrace, and his disciples brought it when we would not settle.
    11:09 AM - Jun 14, 2018

    Twitter Ads info and privacy Image


    Donald Trump Jr., left, Eric Trump and Ivanka Trump at an Eric Trump Foundation event in 2015.CreditGrant Lamos IV/Getty Images

    The $10,000 portrait of Mr. Trump was one of “at least five self-dealing transactions” facilitated by the foundation, according to the attorney general’s office, violating tax regulations that prohibit using nonprofit charities for private interests.

    In 2007, to settle a dispute between the City of Palm Beach and Mr. Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort, the foundation paid $100,000 to the Fisher House Foundation, another charity.

    In 2012, a man named Martin B. Greenberg sued the Trump National Golf Club after he made a hole in one at a fund-raising golf tournament that had promised to pay $1 million to golfers who aced the 13th hole, as he did. As part of a settlement, the charitable foundation paid $158,000 to a foundation run by Mr. Greenberg.

    The foundation also paid $5,000 to one organization for “promotional space featuring Trump International Hotels,” and another $32,000 to satisfy a pledge made by a privately held entity controlled by Mr. Trump to a charitable land trust.

    [For more on the foundation: The Donald J. Trump Foundation, Explained]

    The foundation lawsuit, and the referrals to the federal agencies, are the latest of Mr. Trump’s voluminous legal challenges, starting with the ongoing investigation by the special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, into ties between Mr. Trump, his associates and Russia.

    The attorney general’s action is also likely to embolden critics who have accused Mr. Trump of flouting legal norms. Mr. Trump has suggested he might pardon himself in the Mueller investigation and has repeatedly assailed the Federal Bureau of Investigation.



    First Canada Tried to Charm Trump. Now It’s Fighting Back.


    The Strange Case of the Missing Joyce Scholar


    Who Is Behind Trump’s Links to Arab Princes? A Billionaire Friend

    “As our investigation reveals, the Trump Foundation was little more than a checkbook for payments from Mr. Trump or his businesses to nonprofits, regardless of their purpose or legality,” said Barbara D. Underwood, New York’s attorney general, who has been on the job a little over a month. “This is not how private foundations should function and my office intends to hold the foundation accountable for its misuse of charitable assets.”

    Many of the examples cited in the lawsuit were first reported by The Washington Post.

    Numerous state and federal laws preclude nonprofit organizations and charities like the Trump Foundation from lobbying, aiding a political campaign, or giving undue benefits that further a person’s self-interests, rather than those of the organization. The restrictions are in place to ensure that donations are used for the expressed purpose of the nonprofits; violations can result in penalties, including revocation of the organization’s nonprofit status.

    The petition notes that Mr. Trump himself signed annual I.R.S. filings, under penalty of perjury, in which he attested that the foundation did not engage in political activity. “This statutory prohibition is absolute.”

    Yet after the Iowa fund-raiser, Mr. Trump’s foundation “ceded control over the charitable funds it raised to senior Trump campaign staff, who dictated the manner in which the foundation would disburse those proceeds, directing the timing, amounts and recipients of the grants,” according to the petition.

    That same month, an official at the foundation emailed Mr. Lewandowski, who was Mr. Trump’s campaign manager at the time, telling him “we should start thinking about how you want to distribute the funds collected.”

    Mr. Lewandowski, in a reply, wrote that “I think we should get the total collected and then put out a press release that we distributed the $$ to each of the groups.” He later sent a list of veterans’ groups “purportedly approved by Mr. Trump to receive grants from the Foundation.”

    Read the Lawsuit Against the Trump Foundation

    The full text of the petition the New York Attorney General filed against the Donald J. Trump Foundation.


    41 pages, 2.06 MB

    The list was created by another campaign staffer, Lisa Maciejowski Gambuzza, and edited by a third, Stuart Jolly, a political director. And Mr. Lewandowski asked that some of the disbursements be made in Iowa in the days before that state’s presidential nominating caucuses, which mark the kickoff of the primary calendar.

    Allowing the campaign to control the spending of the foundation’s charitable funds represented coordination between the two entities, as well as “an improper in-kind contribution of no less than $2.823 million (the amount donated to the foundation) to the campaign,” according to the lawsuit.

    Beyond the restitution, the foundation and its directors could face several million dollars in additional penalties, depending on how the court rules. The attorney general’s office is also seeking to bar the president from serving as a director, officer or trustee of another nonprofit for 10 years.

    Likewise, the petition seeks to bar Mr. Trump’s three eldest children, Donald Jr., Ivanka and Eric, from the boards of nonprofits based in New York or that operate in New York for one year, which would have the effect of barring them from a wide range of groups based in other states.

    While the three eldest children ostensibly served on the foundation board from 2006 to 2017, the board never even met after 1999, according to the petition, which called the foundation “an empty shell that functions with no oversight by its board of directors.”

    The action could force Mr. Trump’s children to curtail relationships with a variety of organizations. Last year, for example, Ms. Trump said she created a charitable fund, the Ivanka M. Trump Charitable Fund, to receive the unpaid portion of her book advance and any future royalties. In her government ethics report disclosed on Monday, she said she donated $289,300 to the fund. However, no publicly filed reports are available for that group yet.

    Read the Referral Letters

    The letters the New York Attorney General sent to the Internal Revenue Service and the Federal Election Commission detailing accusations against the Donald J. Trump Foundation.


    22 pages, 1.92 MB

    After the election, Eric Trump distanced himself from his charitable foundation, which has also been under investigation by the attorney general’s office related to shifting its resources to the Trump Organization.

    Mr. Trump long feuded with Ms. Underwood’s predecessor, Eric Schneiderman, who resigned last month amid a scandal involving allegations that he had physically abused a number of his girlfriends. Weeks after the 2016 election, Mr. Schneiderman’s office issued a “notice of violation” to the foundation, which had already attracted scrutiny over its practices, and ordered it to immediately stop soliciting charitable donations in the state.

    Amanda Miller, a spokeswoman for the Trump Organization, released a statement from the Trump Foundation on Thursday that characterized the lawsuit as “politics at its very worst.” The statement accused Mr. Schneiderman of using the foundation investigation “to not only advance his own political goals, but also for his own political fund-raising,” and suggested that Ms. Underwood has shown that “such political attacks will continue unabated.”

    Mr. Schneiderman’s resignation had raised questions whether his office, which had been at the heart of the Democratic legal resistance against the Trump administration, would persist in such efforts.

    By filing the lawsuit, Ms. Underwood, who is a career prosecutor rather than a politician, seems inclined to do so.

    She also recently accused Mr. Trump of “undermining the rule of law” with his pardon practices. She made the comment when she announced she was continuing an effort begun under Mr. Schneiderman to change New York’s double-jeopardy law so that state and local prosecutors would have the power to bring criminal charges against aides to Mr. Trump who have been pardoned.

    The Trump Foundation has been in legal limbo since after the election, when the president wanted to dissolve it amid growing controversy about its practices. But in late 2016, a spokeswoman for the attorney general’s office, Amy Spitalnick, said the foundation “cannot legally dissolve” while it is under investigation.

    The attorney general’s referrals to the I.R.S. and the F.E.C. could add another wrinkle that might slow the foundation’s dissolution. The agencies are not known for their expeditious handling of enforcement actions, and the lawsuit notes that the foundation cannot legally complete its wind down “until the complaints to the Internal Revenue Service and Federal Election Commission have been resolved and it is determined if any penalties or fines will be imposed on the foundation.”


    The Times needs your voice. We welcome your on-topic commentary, criticism and expertise.

    Jesse Drucker and Kenneth P. Vogel contributed reporting.

  • What do you think the result of this will be.... I mean... lots of sound and fury but what will the result be? And... does this open the door to go after the corrupt klinton foundation?


    "Don't let it end like this. Tell them I said something."

    Pancho Villa, last words (1877 - 1923)

  • It's funny how you tards fell for the idiotic fake anti-clinton propaganda, then you elected an actual criminal piece of shit. It could not be more obvious that you don't give a shit about rule of law. You just want more handouts to billionaires by any means necessary.

  • Wait... you honestly do not think the klintons are the most corrupt politicians of all time? seriously?

    Can you imagine what would have gotten dug up if the media had been 24/7 anti klinton? or someone sent agents to raid their offices and lawyers offices? sheesh.


    "Don't let it end like this. Tell them I said something."

    Pancho Villa, last words (1877 - 1923)

  • Wait... you honestly do not think the klintons are the most corrupt politicians of all time? seriously?

    Can you imagine what would have gotten dug up if the media had been 24/7 anti klinton? or someone sent agents to raid their offices and lawyers offices? sheesh.


    Clinton and Trump were both under FBI investigation during the campaign. But the FBI only chose to make Clinton's investigation public. Why? The FBI chose to help elect Trump, yet you tards still believe that they are somehow biased against him. Maybe they are just biased against criminal pieces of shit.

    Your cult leader is an actual criminal piece of shit. You'll never hear it from your demagogues, but that is reality. There is enough integrity left within the FBI to enforce rule of law. Much of the Trump Crime Family will be behind bars before this is over. We are watching historical events bigger than Watergate. When your grandkids are adults, they will marvel at how you idiotic cultists could support such an obvious criminal piece of shit.

  • Ok.. you seriously don't think anyone important will be behind bars right? so forget that masturbatory dream of yours....

    The FBI.... no one but you does not think they were led by a lying sack of shit and now 28 agents are willing to speak up on how they helped Hillary.

    Think about it.... they (like you) were convinced that hillary would win... why would they help Trump? what passes for logic in your universe?


    "Don't let it end like this. Tell them I said something."

    Pancho Villa, last words (1877 - 1923)

  • The IG report released yesterday covered all this. Comey chose to make a public statement declaring that the investigation into Clinton's emails was being reopened. Then he chose to make another public statement criticizing her for being irresponsible, but not quite to a level of criminality.

    Meanwhile, there was an ongoing FBI investigation into Trump's collusion with Russia and his corrupt financial dealings. And the FBI was silent. We didn't learn about that until after the election.

    How is that not biased in favor of Trump? Why did they choose to keep the investigation into his far more serious crimes a secret until after the election?

  • Why would they do that? respect for the FBI is at an all time low.... Agents are pissed. the majority of people have common sense and see that the FBI has always went with the people in power.... who... oddly enough control the money and the hiring.

    The emails... russia... at this point what is it? 10% of the people actually think there was a russian connection and most think it was uranium one.

    The emails.... everyone knows she destroyed evidence... everyone knows she is a crook... everyone heard Trump say "because you would be in jail" and seen her quake in fear.

    No one believes or EVER believed in the russian connection... it is a fucking joke. it is not a serious crime because there is nothing to it. Not one piece of evidence.. this last thing where the russian companies showed up for a trial and demanded to see mule ears evidence just put a cherry on top of this joke.


    "Don't let it end like this. Tell them I said something."

    Pancho Villa, last words (1877 - 1923)

  • Lets see how it all turns out. One of us may indeed be proven to be brainwashed... but pray tell... where is my brainwashing coming from? most every news source is 'hate Trump 24/7'


    "Don't let it end like this. Tell them I said something."

    Pancho Villa, last words (1877 - 1923)

  • It amazes me on this. All the investigation on Trump collusion with Russia to only stumble on the shit the Killtons have been doing. And we are brainwashed?


    2020, America's New Civil War.

    If people do not display wisdom, they will crash like blind moles and then mutual annihilation will commence.

    Hitler: "We will drown them in their own blood!"
    Stalin: "We will drown them in our own blood!"

    Jong-un: "We will drown us in our own blood!"

    Senator Elizabeth Warren, winner of the 2018 Rachel Dolezal Award.

    Dems: "Tell us the truth"
    Barr: "There was spying"

  • exactly.... Trump is getting the swamp dwellers to drain their own swamp.

    I am as happy as a puppy who just discovered his penis.


    "Don't let it end like this. Tell them I said something."

    Pancho Villa, last words (1877 - 1923)