The Alt-Right is Killing People

  • The first question: "If economic globalisation is inevitable, it should primarily serve humanity rather than the interests of trans-national corporations."


    If you don't think your answer to whether you agree with that or not reveals something about your political leanings you either are an idiot in the original Greek and Latin meaning of the word, or you're a moron.

    LOL! You're a retard if you think that's the only two answers. That you can't see that is telling.

  • It's a statement of principle, not a question. You can either agree with it or not. If you do you support statism in the form of a world government (in some degree or fashion) that can regulate international trade. If you don't you support economic freedom and capitalism.


    What other option do you see pray tell?

    "With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censured, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."

  • It's a statement of principle, not a question. You can either agree with it or not. If you do you support statism in the form of a world government (in some degree or fashion) that can regulate international trade. If you don't you support economic freedom and capitalism.


    What other option do you see pray tell?

    It pits humanity vs the interest of multi-national conglomerates. "Rather than". It gives you the choice of two. It is a stupid question with little to no rationale. Who believes either of those things? Nobody. Who believes that you increase the worth of your nation by exporting and want to reduce importing, but need to make concessions with countries attempting to do the same to equalize things for the better of everyone, including humanity and multi-national conglomerates that are made up of... wait for it... humanity?

  • Then your answer is that the interests of humanity intersects with the interests of multi-national conglomerates. Congratulations. You have just answered the question. And it's the right answer btw. That is you disagree or strongly disagree with the notion that the interest of humanity is separate and in conflict with the interests of multi-national conglomerates.

    "With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censured, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."

  • You're one of those rare borderline cases MiniDick. You're just smart enough to see the trap, but not smart enough to figure it out. You see, a socialist would agree or strongly agree with that statement because socialists believe that the interests of humanity is in conflict with the interests of free trade and capitalism. They see an international conglomerate as an enemy of humanity, not as a beneficial trading partner.

    "With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censured, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."

  • Then your answer is that the interests of humanity intersects with the interests of multi-national conglomerates. Congratulations. You have just answered the question. And it's the right answer btw. That is you disagree or strongly disagree with the notion that the interest of humanity is separate and in conflict with the interests of multi-national conglomerates.

    My answer is that those aren't two ends of a spectrum. They have very little to do with the spectrum, other than blips. Congratulations, you still don't understand why two point questions are stupid.

  • I don't know... when someone asks me to support something for the good of 'humanity' I get a tad suspicious. I mean..


    lazs

    "Don't let it end like this. Tell them I said something."



    Pancho Villa, last words (1877 - 1923)

  • Sorry Goat but I ain't buying it. My 86 year old Uncle, a Trump supporter, was assaulted by several of your Antifa brown shirts while attending a Trump rally in San Jose. They slapped him around, took his ballcap, spit on him- all because he supported Trump.


    Up until then I didn't have a dog in the fight- I still say Trump is delivering the right message of no politics as usual, but man o man, he's flawed as a messenger- but you guys made an enemy by attacking an old man and beating him over his political beliefs. You're a jack booted brown shirt. Your women scream hysterically and you condone the beating of old people who disagree with you.


    You don't believe in dialog and discussion- you stand for fear, intimidation and violence. That's the New Left.

  • Newly created posts will remain inaccessible for others until approved by a moderator.

    The last reply was more than 365 days ago, this thread is most likely obsolete. It is recommended to create a new thread instead.